Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Anonymization Reassessment: Six Changes to Watch is a practical trigger guide for privacy, legal, governance and data teams. It helps organizations identify when assumptions behind an earlier anonymization assessment may need to be revisited because the data, available information, access conditions, re-identification techniques or AI capabilities have changed.
The guide is based on EDPB Guidelines 02/2026 on Anonymization and supporting technical research on re-identification, including record linkage, inference, mobility re-identification and emerging LLM/agentic techniques. It provides six reassessment signals, practical checks and a simple escalation pathway for deciding when to monitor, conduct targeted testing or consider a fuller reassessment.
This resource is a reassessment trigger aid, not a substitute for a full legal or technical anonymization assessment.
Libra_Sentinel_Anonymization_Reassessment_September_2026 (pdf)
Download
Assess proposed and existing AI products, features and use cases, and design proportionate controls before and after launch.

Establish the organizational structures, supplier controls and contractual protections needed to govern AI across the business and its supply chain.

Create defensible governance records, prepare for incidents and disputes, and equip leaders and teams to manage AI risk effectively.
Different AI vendors do not always mean genuinely independent AI systems. This free 12-question guide helps organizations uncover shared dependencies across models, infrastructure, APIs, data sources and failure patterns. Use it to assess whether backups, second opinions and human review are truly independent, and to identify gaps in substitutability, incident response, procurement and ongoing monitoring. It is a research-derived governance aid, not a regulatory checklist.
Libra Sentinel__COMMON-MODE_AI RISK_CHECKLIST (pdf)
DownloadTurn your AI inventory into a dependency map. This free Excel template helps organizations trace AI applications through vendors, APIs, models, data sources, cloud services and other infrastructure, while recording criticality, fallbacks, verification evidence and ownership.
The workbook automatically highlights shared critical dependencies and shared fallbacks using validated, distinct connections.
It is a practical companion to the governance checklist, not a risk score or proof of behavioural independence.
Libra_Sentinel_AI_Dependency_Map_Template (xlsx)
DownloadA practical companion to Web Scraping & Article 9 GDPR: Is Sensitive Data Yours for the Taking?
This checklist translates the EDPB’s draft Guidelines 03/2026 into practical governance actions and evidence requirements across six stages: scoping, sourcing and collection, post-collection controls, training and evaluation, deployment, and the AI supply chain. It also includes the EDPB’s four-condition test, illustrative examples, warning signs that processing is no longer merely incidental, and links to the primary legal sources.
Article_9_Web_Scraping_Governance_Checklist (pdf)
DownloadCopyright © 2026 Libra Sentinel - Data Privacy & AI Governance - All Rights Reserved.
-214aacb.png/:/cr=t:27.27%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:45.45%25/rs=w:515,h:234,cg:true)
Libra Sentinel helps organizations assess AI products and use cases, establish governance and contractual controls, and prepare for scrutiny, incidents and disputes.
This site uses only essential cookies required for performance, security, and session management. We do not use advertising, tracking, or analytics cookies. We honor GPC signals and do not share or sell personal data.